Nonviolent Power
October 29, 2009 at 12:25 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Ethics, Nonviolence, Philosophy, Quotes
To have power is not the same as to abuse power. Take care not to misuse your power, nor limit it or give it away. We all have power and it can ALWAYS be used for the greater good.
What is Love?
September 26, 2009 at 8:03 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Ethics, Philosophy, Spirituality
A pretty overused word, that’s for sure, which leads to a very superficial understanding among many.
So, my starter for ten is the definition I came up with 5 years ago when I fell in love for the first time (unrequited!).
“Love is the willingness to sacrifice everything, not withstanding the worthiness of its recipient.”
Bearing in mind my understanding of Christ and the Christian faith I had at the time, it makes sense.
But, undoutably, I’m not in the same head space now, so I guess we need to do some more pondering . . .
In the meantime, if anyone has any thoughts, do let me know!
—————————————–
Today, I read a new definition that I like:
“Love is the condition in which the happiness of another person is essential to your own.”
———————————————————————————————————
“Love is a combination of six ingredients: care, commitment, knowledge, responsibility, respect and trust.” – Bell Hooks
Nature, Nurture and Nonviolence
May 28, 2009 at 9:38 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Ethics, Nonviolence
I watched a programme on iplayer, hosted by Michael Portillo, called ‘How Violent Are You?’. There were many interesting insights there. For instance, he went to an annual festival of violence in Latin America, where anyone can fight anyone the same age/size. Even the children are encouraged to fight, urged on by the crowd. There was also a repeat of the famous experiment, whereby people were told (by the scientist) to give electric shocks to the person in the next room answering questions. Always worrying, I can only hope I have what it takes not to follow orders/authority against my own conscience. He also identified that loss of sleep, alcohol and drugs all increase our senstivity to violence.
The most interesting insight, however, was this. Up until the age of three, children have no control over their “violent” impulses. After all, it is a necessary survival tool. However, after this, if the child is taught to share and disagree nonviolently, the brain actually changes shape. A lesson of nurture over nature. I happened to mention this to a friend of mine, who was unsuprised. Apparantly, the same thing happens when a buddhist monk meditates on compassion. How fascinating. Certainly this suggests that the human spirit has a vast capacity to change for the better.
Uncertainty: a human condition
May 2, 2009 at 9:53 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 1 CommentTags: Ethics, Philosophy, Spirituality
Both religion and science are responses to human uncertainty.
Uncertainty is good and the natural course.
We may crave certainty, but, in reality, certainty is the most dangerous thing there is…
…it leads to fundamentalism – both scientific and religious – and closes off the progress that comes from discourse.
(Inspired by a lecture from Sir Robert Winston)
Core Values
May 2, 2009 at 4:25 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Ethics, Homemaking, Nonviolence, Philosophy, Play, Spirituality
If I can live a life consistant with these values, I shall be one happy-bunny!
1) Wisdom
In Matthew 10:16, it says, “be wise as serpents, and innocent as doves.”
On the one hand, this means acting in a way that is above reproach, that cannot be construed as anything but “good” and well-meaning: being “angelic”. On the other hand, it relates to being fully aware of your surroundings – the violent intentions that may lie in the hearts of men (to trip you up or catch you out) – and not having your head up in the clouds: being “cunning”.
It means being a person that looks for the good in others, but is conscious of the potential for violence and is fully-armed to deal with it; perceiving individuals as grey, neither black nor white.
Wonder
“I don’t know about you, but I practice a disorganized religion. I belong to an unholy disorder. We call ourselves “Our Lady of Perpetual Astonishment.”
From Vonnegut’s, A Man Without A Country
By wonder, I mean continually being in a state of expectancy and enchantment. In “Summer Holiday”, the French mime says that when you’re travelling, you’re always “beholded”: thus, whatever happens, you always appreciate it.
Wonder leads to gratitude, and gratitude leads to joy.
Who can look at the moon and the stars and not feel a faint, ‘wow!’ echoing in their soul?
Whether it is a direct or indirect acknowledgement of Something More does not matter. What matters is seeking out those moments.
“may my heart always be open to little
birds who are the secrets of living
whatever they sing is better than to know
and if men should not hear them men are old”
(ee cummings)
3) Tender-heartedness
“If I can stop one heart from breaking,
I shall not live in vain;
If I can ease one life the aching,
Or cool one pain,
Or help one fainting robin
Unto his nest again,
I shall not live in vain.”
(Emily Dickinson)
To have a hard heart is to be closed off from the suffering of humanity. Though we can be joyous in all moments, we cannot pretend away suffering.
To feel their pain, with empathy.
To suffer with them, with compassion.
And most of all, to act, somehow, someway, however small.
May I never walk past a person in tears and not reach for a hankerchief.
May I never walk past a person hungry and fail to give them food.
May I never walk past a person “invisible” and fail to greet them through the eyes.
4) Authenticity
“And this above all, to thine own self be true” (Shakespeare)
This is not about being self-centred and doing what you want at the expense of other people. The example that comes to mind is a person have an extra-marital affair, and saying they’re following their heart.
I see it more as a movement away from the Ego (the socialised self) towards the Id (what you are when no-one’s looking). It means finding that spark of divinity – a jewel within you – and not hiding it away in embarassment. Dare not be less for society’s measly sake; be more, for the sake of Something More.
“Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our Light, not our Darkness, that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you NOT to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightening about shrinking so that other people won’t feel unsure around you. We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It is not just in some of us; it is in everyone. As we let our own Light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. “ (Nelson Mandela)
5) Playfullness
Play is a much under-rated value. Somehow, people think work is something grown up and serious, and play childish and frivolous. I could not differ more.
In Alexander Technique lessons, we talk about a child learn to write. Over and over, they get the letter upside-down or back-to-front. Over and over, the parent/teacher makes the child repeat it. As the parent/teacher gets steadily more stressed, they tense up their body saying ‘concentrate!’ The little child, imitating the adult, will tense up their body and try really hard to please the parent. And maybe this time they get it right. The parent commends them, and from this day on, the child will associate concentration and effort with reward.
In actual fact, when we are in a state of “play”, we learn much more, we are more open to possibilities, linkages and ideas.
To play is one of the most important things we can do.
“We don’t stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.”
(George Bernard Shaw)
6) Nonviolence
(I did try to make it 5 – for neatness – but it was impossible!)
Violence is anything that dominates, diminishes, dehumanises or destroys yourself or anyone else.
To be nonviolent, therefore, is to hold this tension. To walk the tightrope between being dominated or dominating others.
This strand runs through many of the famous texts:
“Love you neighbour as yourself” springs to mine.
“Live half for yourself and half for others” (Doshin So) also.
The Golden Rule.
It is a fascinating, endless exploration and one that shall endure for a life-time.
To live gently without being trampled; to make an impression, not a mark.
How about you? What are your core values and why are they important?
From an article about the reconstruction of Northern Sri Lanka
March 9, 2009 at 10:38 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Economics, Ethics, Nonviolence
But when one girl is asked what she likes most about peace, she says simply: “Electricity.” (Joe Leahy, Financial Times, March 8th 2009)
A telling comment.
In the battle…
March 6, 2009 at 11:29 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Ethics, Philosophy, Spirituality
…between frigid fundamentalists and aggressive atheists, the time comes to take up the choice positions on the battlefield:
The fundamentalists take the moral high ground; the atheists the intellectual high ground.
Can Everyone Be A Winner?
March 4, 2009 at 1:27 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Ethics, Nonviolence, Philosophy
There is to be a protest march on Saturday regarding violence against women. I was discussing with a friend why I wouldn’t be attending, and expressing what I find problematic about the ‘-isms’:
It is true, and distressing, that increasing amounts of physically violent acts are purported against women. Listening today to the World Service, I heard about the commands given to soldiers in Dafur to rape women AND children. As part of a war strategy, doing this in front of the menfolk, increases males own feeling of impotence, and therefore, is psycologically effective in reducing the desire to fight back.
Furthermore, violence against women is a signal of increasing levels of inequality, dislocation from society and unhappiness. The old adage talks about a man told off by his boss, who comes home and beats his wife. I think there is an immense amount of truth in this analogy, and therefore, whenever acts of violence are purported, we need to look back at the earliers links in the vicious cycle.
The power dynamics between the sexes are sadly still in favour of men across many parts of the world; you only need to read the statistics regarding the number of ‘missing women’ in the world to be aware of this.
However, a definition of violence that only includes physicall abuse is far too narrow. Rather, I see violence as being anything that diminishes, dehumanises, destroys or dominates yourself or others. With that definition, we can see that women are equally as violent as men. The methods may differ – often more verbal – as the process of socialization often prescribes the methods of violence that are acceptable to different sexes. (In fact, physical violence is too often seen as the rite of passage into manhood) Nonetheless, the root is the same.
What we need to do is to look further up the circle of violence, and analyse the sytemic and societal causes of people feeling diminished, dehumanised, destroyed or dominated and reacting – violently – against this.
The problem I have with the ‘-isms’ is that, all too often, people are separated into victims and aggressors, men and women, worker and capitalist. This victim-aggressor dichotomy allows those reacting against violence to represent themselves as ‘innocent’ without looking at the violence within themselves. The sides become polarised because no-one wants to identify themselves with the aggressor.
Again, this is the problem I have with Holocaust Rememberance Day; how come people are happy to expend cheap emotion on the victims of the Holocaust, walking around in those mocassins. We could just as well put ourselves in the shoes of the ordinary men and women, who worked as prison guards in concentration camps, and then went home and played with the kids. But that is far more unpalatable, isn’t it.
When we separate people into victims and aggressors, parties become entrenched and anyone trying to walk across the ‘no man’s land’ is shot down in flames. Inevitably, violence leads to more violence. Those who are being oppressed, first oppress those who are more vulnerable, then, as their own sense of power increases, and they ‘win’, they punish the people that had oppressed them in the first place. This is the problem with violent revolutions: they lead to more violence, rather than the expected Promised Land.
Where there are winners and losers in any human struggle, humanity itself is never a winner. 1-0 or 0-1 will be the result this decade, and 0-1 or 1-0 in the next! With unabashed idealism, I wonder whether we can all push for 1-1.
If my brother is unhappy, I cannot be happy; we are all interconnected. So the same should go for men and women, workers and capitalists, introverts and extraverts
: if we can seek solutions in the interest of both parties, then everyone will be better off. It will take a lot of energy, but much less perhaps than the energy wasted on entrenched struggles. Let’s all agree to stand eye-to-eye with the violence within ourselves, and refuse it.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.